November 24, 2020
Facebook said users were more aggressively posting images of violence in places like war-torn Syria.Facebook took down 3.The report marked Facebook’s first breakdown on how much material it removes for violating its policies. The content screening has nothing to do with privacy protection, though, and is aimed at maintaining a family-friendly atmosphere for users and advertisers."Even if they remove 100 million posts that are offensive, there will be one or two that have some really bad stuff and those will be the ones everyone winds up talking about on the cable-TV news,†said Timothy Carone, who teaches about technology at the University of Notre Dame.
It’s not surprising that Facebook’s automated programs have the greatest difficulty trying to figure out differences between permissible opinions and despicable language that crosses the line, Carone said.Facebook’s self-assessment showed its screening system is far better at scrubbing graphic violence, gratuitous nudity and terrorist propaganda.Getting rid of racist, sexist and other hateful remarks on Facebook is more challenging than weeding out other types of unacceptable posts because computer programs still stumble over the nuances of human language, the company revealed.5 per cent of the violations Facebook identified in those categories.3 billion accounts — and that doesn’t even count all the times the company blocked bogus profiles before they could be set up."It’s like trying to figure out the equivalent between screaming ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theatre when there is none and the equivalent of saying something that is uncomfortable but qualifies as free speech,†he said.
The rest came after Facebook users flagged the offending content for review.Facebook said it removed 2.5 million pieces of content deemed unacceptable hate speech during the first three months of this year, up from 1.6 million during the previous quarter.All told, Facebook took action on nearly 1.6 billion pieces of content during the six months ending in March, a tiny fraction of all the activity on its social network, according to the company. For instance, the company estimated that for every 10,000 times that people looked at content on its social network, 22 to 27 of the views may have included posts that included impermissible graphic violence.Had the company not shut down all those fake accounts, its audience of monthly users would have swelled beyond its current 2.Instead of trying to determine how much offending material it didn’t catch, Facebook provided an estimate on how frequently it believes users saw posts that violated its standards, including content that its screening system didn’t detect. It didn’t disclose how long it takes Facebook to remove material violating its standards. In this case, better detection was only part of the reason. The report also doesn’t cover how much inappropriate content Facebook missed.Fake accounts on Facebook have been drawing more attention because Russian agents used them to buy ads to try to influence the 2016 election in the US.For hate speech, Facebook’s human reviewers and computer algorithms identified just 38 per cent of the violations.Even though it has been focusing on shutting down bogus accounts, Facebook has said that 3 to 4 per cent of its active monthly users are fake.
Automated tools detected 86 per cent to 99.The increased transparency comes as the Menlo Park, California, company tries to make amends for a privacy scandal triggered by loose policies that allowed a data-mining company with ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign to harvest personal information on as many as 87 million users. The company credited better detection, even as it said computer programs have trouble understanding context and tone of language.4 million pieces of graphic violence during the first three months of this year, nearly triple the 1.2 billion and probably created more potentially offensive material for Facebook to weed out.The report also doesn’t address how Facebook is tacking another vexing issue — the proliferation of fake news stories planted by Russian agents and other fabricators trying to sway elections and public opinion.Facebook also released statistics that quantified how pervasive fake accounts have become on its influential service, despite a long-standing Jap plugs policy requiring people to set up accounts under their real-life identities.2 million during the previous three months.. That means as many as 88 million fake Facebook accounts were still slipping through the cracks in the company’s policing system through March.From October to December alone, Facebook disabled nearly 1
Posted by: nbbjapia at
01:39 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 727 words, total size 5 kb.
November 19, 2020
This will be done every three months via a payment wallet. The prices include RTO tax, Rs 22,000 subsidy, insurance, handling charges, GST, smart card fee and registration card.The subscription also covers all maintenance work, including RSA. The electric scooter also features a 200mm front disc and a 190mm rear disc, with regenerative braking and combined braking system (CBS) for added safety. Data services like navigation, vehicle diagnostics and over the air updates are also covered under the subscription.The suspension setup comprises of telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock unit at the rear. Acceleration is also strong - the 340 clocks the 0-40kmph sprint in a claimed 5.
Ather won’t take a single penny for charging the scooter at any of the AtherGrid points installed in the city.Other scooters, competing against the Ather 340 & 450 are the Okinawa Praise (Rs 59,899) and the Twenty Two Motors Flow (Rs 74,740) (all prices ex-showroom). The company claims a maximum realistic range Europe Plugs of 75km for the 450 and 60km for the 340, although the ARAI certified ranges are much higher. It's the most expensive scooter in India right now, but there’s a lot more to it than meets the eye.9 seconds.
For the prices announced, you don’t just get the scooter, but it also includes the standard installation costs, a charging cable and a one-year subscription plan of Rs 9912 (incl. So, labour charges, replacement of parts under regular maintenance and even consumables like brake pads will be covered. To know more about the scooter, read our in-depth first ride review or watch the video review on YouTube. That’s not all, the company will even reimburse the amount spent on charging the scooter at home.Source: ZigWheels. On the performance front, the company claims that the 340 can achieve a top speed of 70kmph while the 450 is good for 80kmph.
The motor generates 20Nm on the 340 and 20.But don’t let that expensive price tag fool you.5Nm on the 450. The Ather 340 is priced at Rs 1,09,750, whereas the Ather 450 retails for Rs 1,24,750 (both prices on-road Bengaluru) with sales limited only to Bengaluru for now.Coming to the scooter itself, the 340 and the 450 are propelled by a brushless DC motor (BLDC) and use an indigenously-developed battery pack and battery management system
Posted by: nbbjapia at
02:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 392 words, total size 3 kb.
November 12, 2020
Posted by: nbbjapia at
02:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 980 words, total size 7 kb.
32 queries taking 0.0264 seconds, 49 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.